Cricket is a stupid game, a waste of time

I had never showed interest in watching football or soccer matches before. I only used to play football i.e. I used to employ the tactic of kicking the ball hard in the direction of my goal, wherever i was on the field. This made me a good footballer in school, because in school, all the 20 players (other than the goal keepers) were approximately 2.7 metres away from the place the ball was on the field. So, my tactic worked in freeing the ball from dangerous tackles. So, when i used to watch matches on TV, I was amazed at the incompetence shown by the players. I was shocked at their play and commented at their lack of "power" in kicking the ball a long way. So, i stopped watching football on TV.
Well, all this was until the recent world cup. Amdocs decided to show the matches on big screen. No, this was not what attracted me to watch the matches. All the matches were preceded by quiz and bingo events with good prizes. It is a different fact that i didn't win any. But, i ended up watching the matches though.
Then, I started comparing football with my passion, cricket. I began to realise how inferior cricket was, in comparison to this great game. If there were to be a definition of cricket, it would be something like this...

"You have two sides, one out on the field and one in . Each man that's in the side that's in, goes out and when he's out, he comes in and the next man goes in until he's out. When they are all out, the side that's out comes in and the side that's been in goes out and tries to get those coming in out. Sometimes you get men still in and not out. When both sides have been in and out including the not outs, that's the end of the game!"

Well, the game of cricket is as confusing as is its definition. The rules are worse. Try describing a googly or a leg break to someone new to cricket. They would definitely be worried about breaking their leg. Compared to this, understanding the offside rule in football is a walk in the park! Why should anyone playing a game want to bowl a maiden over, or score a duck?

The inventor of the game would have definitely been booked under the eve-teasing act for creating "positions" like square legs, short legs and long legs. Try to explain as to why you need a third man when there are already eleven out in the field?
George Bernard Shaw once said,

"Cricket is a game played by 22 fools and watched by 22,000 fools"

For once, i totally agree with him. Cricket is a game which is totally against the concept of sport. Sport should above all, give exercise to the players. How does cricket justify this in terms of the time spent? Cricket is a game in which only two players out of eleven play, while the others can choose to play cards or even sleep, and two players of the other team (the bowler and the wicket-keeper) sweat it out while the others keep trying their luck in the field. How are we to account for this colossal waste of time, not to mention the huge sums of money spent on it, in the name of playing a game?
Talking abt skill levels, imagine the wonderful game of baseball , where so much skill is required to hit the ball within a particular sector, whereas in cricket , u can hit it anywhere in the 360 degree radius, C'mon u don't need skill to hit it anywhere u want.
The even stranger thing about this game is the longer version, test cricket. I am sure that Test cricket must have been invented by a man, whose wife would have commented , "The longer the better" and he immediately created test cricket. But , the poor man , in his hurry , forgot to listen completely to his wife who had said " The longer the better and of course with a proper climax" imagine watching a long and boring test match and at the end of 5 days , the two captains shake hands and walk off! No victor, no loser, C'mon where is the thrill, ecstasy?Nothing ! Test cricket is the perfect example describing the word anti-climax !
Cricket is definitely not a brave mans game. You have a thigh guard, an arm guard and so many other guards, virtually to cover every inch of your body, whereas in baseball, when batting, they have to stand on a home plate, without the luxury of a facemask, pads on their ribs, padded gloves, or pads on their legs, all protections available to a cricketer. Now that is a mans game, definitely not cricket.
Do you know why Adolf Hitler banned cricket in Germany?. Once He was watching a match that went on and on. He kept asking when it would be over, and someone told him it would continue the next day for the entire day and well into the evening. He said, 'By the time this stupid game is over, I could have conquered three countries.' "
In the so-called gentleman's game of cricket, the players throw the ball in the air after a catch, shout and scream after a run out or for an lbw decision, and deliberately intimidate and sledge the opposition players. This is definitely not the characteristics of a gentleman's game. Nowadays cricket is more a war of words rather than skill. Even players from countries who cannot speak few sentences in English, are perfect in pronouncing all the 4 letter words in English. Look at what the English have taught the world !
cricketers are stupid people This quote by india's former captain Saurav Ganguly would show that

"Nobody is a born captain. Most of the time I have gone on instinct".

Not only the cricketers are stupid , but there are even stupid followers of the game who attempt suicide when their teams loses a game
So, dear ladies and gentleman, never ever try to follow this game. Stay away from it, make good use of your time rather than wasting your time following or playing cricket. I wonder why I wasted so much time writing about this stupid game. I could have rather spent time swatting flies instead.
The views expressed above are from the thoughts of a ghost which took over my body while i was engrossed in refreshing the scores of a closely fought division 4 match happening in England.

Technorati Tags: cricket sport sourav ganguly football soccer George Bernard Shaw